Present your Analysis in a simple report format, using headings to
identify the following sections of content:
Title – a title for your analysis, Introduction,Policy background,Methodology – identify and describe the elements of the WPR methodology used for your analysis,Analysis – use your own headings to present your analysis – include direct quotations from your data to substantiate your analysis,Findings,Conclusion,Reference list (provide a list of all sources cited (minimum 8) and a list of the practical texts analysed (maximum 4) – both in Harvard referencing style
Develop An Analysis Of A Policy Using Bacchi’s WPR Methodology Assignment-Australia.
The WRP Questions for the analysis are in each topic
Topic 1;
Question 1: What’s the ‘problem’ represented to be in a specific policy?
The goal of Question 1 in a WPR approach is to identify implied problem representations in specific policies or policy proposals (Bacchi 2014, p. 4).
See what the policy proposes and ‘read off’ the implied ‘problem’ from this proposal (Bacchi 2014, p. 48).
Topic 2;
Question 2: What presuppositions or assumptions underlie this problem representation?
The goal of Question 2 of a WPR approach is to identify and analyse the conceptual logics that underpin specific problem representations. The term ‘conceptual logic’ refers to the meanings that must be in place for a particular problem representation to cohere or make sense (Bacchi 2014, p. 5).
Topic 3;
Question 3: How has this representation of the ‘problem’ come about?
The purpose of Question 3 of a WPR approach is to highlight the conditions that allow a particular problem representation to take shape and to assume dominance (Bacchi 2014, p. 11).
Develop An Analysis Of A Policy Using Bacchi’s WPR Methodology Assignment-Australia.
The conditions we are interested in here are those external to the policy discourse, what are referred to as non-discursive practices. Foucault described non-discursive practices as including the ‘institutions, political events, economic practices and processes’ which enable a particular problem representation (1972 p. 162). Question 3 requires we consider these discursive practices and the ways they enable particular problem representations over time (Bacchi 2014).
Topic 4;
Question 4: What is left unproblematic in this problem representation? Where are the silences? Can the ‘problem’ be thought about differently?
The objective of Question 4 of a WPR approach is to raise for reflection and consideration issues and perspectives silenced in identified problem representations (Bacchi 2014, p. 13).
Consider a hypothetical example of a local youth crime ‘problem’ represented as a matter of parents not fulfilling their responsibilities. Such a problem representation does not include other considerations such as how young people are criminalised through changing access to public space related to their capacity to be a consumer. Perhaps you can identify other representations of this hypothetical local youth crime ‘problem’?
Topic 5;
Question 5: What effects are produced by this representation of the problem?
The goal of Question 5 of a WPR approach is to identify the effects of specific problem representations so that they can be critically assessed (Bacchi 2014, p. 15).
It is important at this stage to clarify what is meant by the term effects, to avoid any unnecessary confusion with what is commonly referred to as outcomes in conventional approaches to policy analysis. The WPR methodology is not an approach to policy evaluation (Bacchi 2014). We are not interested in the extent to which outcomes of a policy are achieved or not. Such approaches to policy evaluation, that measure policy ‘success’ in terms of meeting predetermined outcomes, have burgeoned along with the take up of evidence-based policy by Western governments. Evidence-based policy is considered in more detail in Topic 7 when the matter of rethinking policy analysis is discussed. For now, it is sufficient to point out that Bacchi (2014) offers the WPR approach as a way to question the very premise of evidence-based policy.
Develop An Analysis Of A Policy Using Bacchi’s WPR Methodology Assignment-Australia.
Turning back to the mechanics of Question 5, it is important to recognise that the effects of problem representations can be very subtle even though they cause harm to some people (Bacchi 2014). Therefore, to analyse the effects of problem representations:
Consider three kinds of effects: discursive effects; subjugation effects; lived effects. Include effects due to the dividing practices (Bacchi 2014, p. 48).
ORDER Now This Develop An Analysis Of A Policy Using Bacchi’s WPR Methodology Assignment And Get Instant Discount
