Reflective Essay Australian Harvard style references ( 6 ref)
In this task you will write a reflection about one of the key messages of the unit: Biased treatment matters in health care.Reflective writing should demonstrate critical reading and thinking skills. The use of ‘I’ is expected in this assessment task (‘I think, I do not agree, I etc).
CNA157 Reflective Essay Australian Assignment-Tasmania University Australia.
Your essay should follow the following format:
1.Define intersectionality and use this framework to describe your cultural location (approximately 200 words)
2.Reflect on how your cultural location, attitudes, values and beliefs might affect the assumptions and practices you bring to the care of patients (approximately 200 words)
3.Describe some culturally safe health care practices you can undertake to avoid biased treatment of patients at an individual level (approximately 250 words)
4.Outline how you can be a health service provider who can advocate for the non-acceptance of biased treatment and contribute towards better circumstances for patients at a population level (approximately 250 words)
Conclusion: Summarise your main points in light of your reflection. Draw on these points in support of your argument for why cultural safety matters as a health care provider (approximately 150 words)
CNA157 Reflective Essay Australian Assignment-Tasmania University Australia.
You are expected to undertake research beyond the unit materials and use a range of books and journal articles. A recommended list that provides a useful starting point can be found at the end of this unit outline. You are required to support your practice reflection with a minimum of 6 scholarly references.
Introduction: Briefly identify the main points that you will explore in the essay (approximately 150 words) assessment rubric, located in Assessment Resources Folder in MyLO (see Assessment 2: Reflective essay)
CNA157 Reflective Essay Australian Assignment-Tasmania University Australia.
Criterion 1 Clearly addresses each component of the task
Criterion 2 Demonstrates skills in critical thinking and reflection (35%)
Criterion 3 Evidence of in-depth engagement with appropriate academic literature and other resources, using a minimum of 6 scholarly references
Criterion 4 Adheres to presentation conventions: legibility, spelling, punctuation, grammar and referencing