| Question 1: Use Classical Political Economy Theory to explain JB Hi-Fi’sdecision to release its profit downgrade in the way it did. Make sure you explain what Institutional Theory is, and support your observations with evidence from the case study. | |
| Answer: Your answer is written here. | |
| References:
Insert your references here, for example: Deegan, C. M. (2014). Financial Accounting Theory (4 ed.). North Ryde, NSW.: McGraw Hill Education (Australia) Pty Ltd. |
|
| Marker’s Comments: The marker will provide feedback here. | Mark (10): |
| 0 | |
ACCT20074 Contemporary Accounting Assignment Help (Central Queensland University)
| Exceeds Expectations
(High Distinction) 85-100% |
Exceeds Expectations (Distinction) 75 – 84% | Meets Expectations
(Credit) 65 – 74% |
Meets Expectations
(Pass) 50 – 64% |
Below Expectations
(Fail) below 50% |
| Demonstrates a balanced and very high level of detailed knowledge of core concepts by providing a very high level of analysis. Utilises current, appropriate and credible sources. | Demonstrates a balanced and high level of knowledge of core concepts by providing a high level of analysis. Utilises mostly current, appropriate and credible sources. | Demonstrates a good level of knowledge of some of the core concepts by providing some level of analysis. Utilises some current, appropriate and credible sources. | Demonstrates limited knowledge of core concepts by providing a limited level of analysis. Utilises few current, appropriate and credible sources. | Demonstrates little, if any, knowledge of the core concepts with extremely limited, if any, analysis. Utilises little, if any, current, appropriate and credible sources. |
| Quality of writing at a very high standard. Paragraphs are coherently connected to each other. Correct grammar, spelling and punctuation. | Quality of writing is of a high standard. Paragraphs are mostly well structured. Few grammar, spelling and punctuation mistakes. | Quality of writing is of a good standard. Few grammar, spelling and punctuation mistakes. | Some problems with sentence structure and presentation Frequent grammar, punctuation and spelling mistakes. Use of inappropriate language. | Quality of writing is at a very poor standard so barely understandable. Many spellingmistakes. Little or no evidence of proof reading. |
| The assessment presents a detailed and focused summary of the ideas presented; drawing clear and well thought-out conclusions. | The assessment presents a fairly detailed and focused summary of the ideas presented; drawing fairly clear and well thought-out conclusions. | The assessment presents a somewhat detailed and focused summary of the ideas presented; providing some evidence of conclusions. | The assessment provides limited detail with no clear summary of the ideas presented; drawing limited conclusions. | The assessment fails to provide any clear evidence of the ideas presented; drawing no clear conclusions. |
ORDER This ACCT20074 Contemporary Accounting Assignment NOW And Get Instant Discount
| Question 2: Use the Managerial branch of Stakeholder Theory to explain JB Hi-Fi’s reporting decisions. Make sure you support your observations with evidence from the case study. | |
| Answer: Your answer is written here. | |
| References:
Insert your references here, for example: Deegan, C. M. (2014). Financial Accounting Theory (4 ed.). North Ryde, NSW.: McGraw Hill Education (Australia) Pty Ltd. |
|
| Marker’s Comments: The marker will provide feedback here. | Mark (10): |
| 0 | |
| Exceeds Expectations
(High Distinction) 85-100% |
Exceeds Expectations (Distinction) 75 – 84% | Meets Expectations
(Credit) 65 – 74% |
Meets Expectations
(Pass) 50 – 64% |
Below Expectations
(Fail) below 50% |
| Demonstrates a balanced and very high level of detailed knowledge of core concepts by providing a very high level of analysis. Utilises current, appropriate and credible sources. | Demonstrates a balanced and high level of knowledge of core concepts by providing a high level of analysis. Utilises mostly current, appropriate and credible sources. | Demonstrates a good level of knowledge of some of the core concepts by providing some level of analysis. Utilises some current, appropriate and credible sources. | Demonstrates limited knowledge of core concepts by providing a limited level of analysis. Utilises few current, appropriate and credible sources. | Demonstrates little, if any, knowledge of the core concepts with extremely limited, if any, analysis. Utilises little, if any, current, appropriate and credible sources. |
| Quality of writing at a very high standard. Paragraphs are coherently connected to each other. Correct grammar, spelling and punctuation. | Quality of writing is of a high standard. Paragraphs are mostly well structured. Few grammar, spelling and punctuation mistakes. | Quality of writing is of a good standard. Few grammar, spelling and punctuation mistakes. | Some problems with sentence structure and presentation Frequent grammar, punctuation and spelling mistakes. Use of inappropriate language. | Quality of writing is at a very poor standard so barely understandable. Many spelling mistakes. Little or no evidence of proof reading. |
| The assessment presents a detailed and focused summary of the ideas presented; drawing clear and well thought-out conclusions. | The assessment presents a fairly detailed and focused summary of the ideas presented; drawing fairly clear and well thought-out conclusions. | The assessment presents a somewhat detailed and focused summary of the ideas presented; providing some evidence of conclusions. | The assessment provides limited detail with no clear summary of the ideas presented; drawing limited conclusions. | The assessment fails to provide any clear evidence of the ideas presented; drawing no clear conclusions. |
ORDER This ACCT20074 Contemporary Accounting Assignment NOW And Get Instant Discount
| Question 3: To what extent do current share prices anticipate future earnings announcements? Use the case study to support your answer. | |
| Answer: Your answer is written here. | |
| References:
Insert your references here, for example: Deegan, C. M. (2014). Financial Accounting Theory (4 ed.). North Ryde, NSW.: McGraw Hill Education (Australia) Pty Ltd. |
|
| Marker’s Comments: The marker will provide feedback here. | Mark (10): |
| 0 | |
| Exceeds Expectations
(High Distinction) 85-100% |
Exceeds Expectations (Distinction) 75 – 84% | Meets Expectations
(Credit) 65 – 74% |
Meets Expectations
(Pass) 50 – 64% |
Below Expectations
(Fail) below 50% |
| Demonstrates a balanced and very high level of detailed knowledge of core concepts by providing a very high level of analysis. Utilises current, appropriate and credible sources. | Demonstrates a balanced and high level of knowledge of core concepts by providing a high level of analysis. Utilises mostly current, appropriate and credible sources. | Demonstrates a good level of knowledge of some of the core concepts by providing some level of analysis. Utilises some current, appropriate and credible sources. | Demonstrates limited knowledge of core concepts by providing a limited level of analysis. Utilises few current, appropriate and credible sources. | Demonstrates little, if any, knowledge of the core concepts with extremely limited, if any, analysis. Utilises little, if any, current, appropriate and credible sources. |
| Quality of writing at a very high standard. Paragraphs are coherently connected to each other. Correct grammar, spelling and punctuation. | Quality of writing is of a high standard. Paragraphs are mostly well structured. Few grammar, spelling and punctuation mistakes. | Quality of writing is of a good standard. Few grammar, spelling and punctuation mistakes. | Some problems with sentence structure and presentation Frequent grammar, punctuation and spelling mistakes. Use of inappropriate language. | Quality of writing is at a very poor standard so barely understandable. Many spelling mistakes. Little or no evidence of proof reading. |
| The assessment presents a detailed and focused summary of the ideas presented; drawing clear and well thought-out conclusions. | The assessment presents a fairly detailed and focused summary of the ideas presented; drawing fairly clear and well thought-out conclusions. | The assessment presents a somewhat detailed and focused summary of the ideas presented; providing some evidence of conclusions. | The assessment provides limited detail with no clear summary of the ideas presented; drawing limited conclusions. | The assessment fails to provide any clear evidence of the ideas presented; drawing no clear conclusions. |
ORDER This ACCT20074 Contemporary Accounting Assignment NOW And Get Instant Discount