Learning Outcomes to be assessed:
LO1 – Identify and describe the QS functions under a variety of main contract
LO3 – Apply estimating techniques to a range of work tasks for construction projects
5CN035 Construction Costing & Procurement Assignment-Wolverhampton University Hong kong.
Marking Criteria – University Performance Descriptors
Using University Level 5 performance descriptors listed below, marks will be awarded for: evidence of justified assumptions; a professional and logical approach; technically correct calculations; accurate methodology and approach using extensive research appropriate to an academic essay layout on different types of tender evaluation mechanism using excel
spreadsheet formulas and basic cost estimate backed up with all the quantities, cost data and calculations. See the more detailed guidance given for each task.
90-100% Outstanding
Level 5 Exceptionally detailed and original response to the assignment, with critical use of independently sourced contextual material. Outstanding demonstration of linked understanding of relevant theory, concepts and models. Extremely well structured with high level of technical competency. All quantities and calculations are correct, signposted and are robustly justified. No obvious errors in referencing or grammar or syntax as appropriate.
80-89% Excellent
Level 5 Very full, independent response to the assignment with totally relevant material which is well beyond any module input, demonstrating independent study. Excellent understanding of relevant theory, concepts and models. Very clear logical structure with an excellent level of technical competency. All quantities and calculations are correct, signposted and justified. Very few errors in referencing or grammar or syntax as appropriate.
70-79% Very good
Level 5 Full response to the assignment with all content relevant and focused. Very good understanding of relevant theory, concepts and models. Application of appropriate theory to examples/practice, demonstrating a rigorous approach to a variety of ideas, contexts or frameworks. A very good and logical structure with a very good level of technical competency. All main quantities and calculations are correct, signposted and in the main justified. Few errors in referencing or grammar or syntax as appropriate.
60-69% Good
Level 5 Answers most if not all detailed aspects of the question. Content mainly relevant. Good knowledge and understanding of relevant theory and concepts and application of theoretical models. Evidence of a developing appreciation of contextual issues. Some minor quantity or calculation errors and missing some signposts and/or lacking justification of some items. Some small repeated errors in referencing or grammar or
syntax as appropriate
50-59% Competent
Level 5 Main issues addressed and solid attempt to answer question. Some relevant content applied. Sound knowledge and understanding of relevant theory and concepts and identification of main issues evident. Some minor quantity and calculation errors and missing signposts justification of many items. Some repeated errors in referencing or grammar or syntax as appropriate.
40-49% Basic
Level 5 Satisfactory attempt to address question/issues with some content relevant to assignment topic. Material engages with relevant module materials, but largely repeats taught input and lacks development or personal interpretation. Some general understanding of topic theory and concepts. Major quantity and calculation errors and/or no justifications. Lacks coherence.
30-39% Retrievable fail
Level 5 Some learning outcomes and / or assessment criteria not met and questions not answered fully. Content not wholly relevant. Little or no evidence of understanding of relevant theory. Very repetitive of taught input – no development or application. Major quantity and calculation errors and no breakdowns evident. Evidence of sufficient grasp of learning outcomes to suggest that the participant will be able to retrieve the
module on re submission.
20-29% Level 5 No learning outcomes fully met. Little attempt to engage with the module materials or ideas.
10-19% Level 5 Little attempt to engage with assignment brief and has not met learning outcomes. Inadequate demonstration of knowledge or understanding of key concepts, theories or practice.
0-9% Level 5No real attempt to address the assignment brief or learning outcomes
Task 1 – LO1 – Identify and describe the QS functions under a variety of main contract
A project involves the refurbishment of a retail store. The project is to be carried out without a total closure of the store while refurbishment works are in progress. The store is located in the ever-busy Kowloon City Centre Mall.
The refurbishment will be done in 3 phases. The first phase will be the upper floor and half of the ground floor. Whilst refurbishment is taking place in the first phase, the store will continue trading on half of the ground floor. Once works have been completed, the refurbishment will be completed to the remaining half of the store and trading will continue in the newly refurbished half of the ground floor and the whole of the first floor. The final phase will be to complete the external elevation. This is the best method and will create minimum interference for customers. Phase 3 will be done at times when the store is closed after trading hours.
A (i) As an estimator for the company, study the proposed work method and identify ten (10) factors (from the information presented above) that could significantly affect your tender estimate.
(ii) Discuss in detail how these ten (10) factors will be considered when preparing an estimate for this project.
(iii) On assumption labour for the above project is to be employed directly by both contractor and subcontractor working on the project, discuss in detail different considerations when estimating for the labour.
(iv) Identify and explain key factors that an estimator will need to consider and make allowances for, when estimating for materials on assumption the above project is a lump sum contract.
5CN035 Construction Costing & Procurement Assignment-Wolverhampton University Hong kong.
B (i) Using a past or existing Hong Kong construction project case study compare and contrast in detail operational estimating and unit rate estimating. In your discussion, include advantages and disadvantages of both operational estimating and unit rate estimating as applicable to the
project case study (500 word limit)
ii) Assuming a 58-week duration has been given for the above project, using the data provided below, estimate the cost of placing concrete per m3 using the operational estimating approach:
C. Using a past or existing Hong Kong construction project case study, discuss Building Information Modelling (BIM) maturity levels and for each level discuss what impact BIM could have on tendering and estimating process. Your narrative is expected to include definitions of 2D, 3D, 4D, 5D, 6D and 7D and the expected benefits of each of these BIM dimensions in
adoption of BIM for Capital Works Project in Hong Kong (700 word limit)
Task 2 – LO3 – Apply estimating techniques to a range of work tasks for construction projects
A. Using the relevant data provided in the data sheet attached and making reasonable assumptions where data is not provided:
(i) Build up a price for the preliminaries item B in the bill of quantities extract attached.
(ii) Build up a unit rate for item D in the bill of quantities extract attached.
(iii) Build up a unit rate for item E in the bill of quantities extract attached.
(iv) Build up a unit rate for item F in the bill of quantities extract attached
Produce and submit your calculations electronically to ensure clarity in your calculations. You MUST include all supporting documentation, notes, assumptions and calculation sheets as applicable. You must also retain a personal electronic copy of your work.
Miscellaneous items from recent bill of quantities based on NRM2 shown below:
Data sheet
Return of assignments:
Assignments will be kept for inspection by the external examiner.
Feedback sheets will normally be available after 4 teaching weeks from receipt in HK so as to review progress.
If you have any questions regarding your feedback you normally have two working weeks from the date you receive your returned assessment and/or written feedback or receive your exam results to contact and discuss the matter with your module tutor.
Cheating
Cheating is any attempt to gain unfair advantage by dishonest means and includes plagiarism and collusion. Cheating is a serious offence. You are advised to check the nature of each assessment. You must work individually unless it is a group assessment.
Cheating
Cheating is defined as any attempt by a candidate to gain unfair advantage in an assessment by dishonest means, and includes e.g. all breaches of examination room rules, impersonating another candidate, falsifying data, and obtaining an examination paper in advance of its authorised release.
Plagiarism is defined as incorporating a significant amount of un-attributed direct quotation from, or un-attributed substantial paraphrasing of, the work of another.
5CN035 Construction Costing & Procurement Assignment-Wolverhampton University Hong kong.
Collusion occurs when two or more students collaborate to produce a piece of work to be submitted (in whole or part) for assessment and the work is presented as the work of one student alone.
ORDER Now This 5CN035 Construction Costing & Procurement Assignment And Get Instant Discount
